22nd Annual Writer’s Digest Self-Published Book Awards
Entry Title
Sally Lightfoot's Journey
Author: C. S. Walkingheart
Judge Number: 4
Entry Category: Children's Picture books
Books
are evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 meaning “needs improvement”
and 5 meaning “outstanding”. This scale is strictly to provide a point
of reference, it is not a cumulative
score and does not reflect ranking.
*If
you wish to reference this review on your website, we ask that you cite
it as such: “Judge, 22nd Annual Writer’s Digest Self-Published Book
Awards.” You may cite portions of your
review, if you wish, but please make sure that the passage you select
is appropriate, and reflective of the review as a whole.
In
some cases, you may see special or out of place characters/symbols in
your commentary. For example, you may see that a character/symbol
replaces an apostrophe,
copyright, and other "symbols". These substitutions occur for various
reasons – and are unavoidable. They are often [programming]
misinterpretations due to encoding, installed fonts, web based
content/sources etc. Since the “content”[data] of the commentary
is comprised of data sent from several different computers (programs,
fonts etc.,) and from the internet (online entry system), you may at
times see an interpretation of what had been an apostrophe, dash,
quotation mark etc.
Structure, Organization, and Pacing: 5
Spelling, Punctuation, and Grammar: 4
Well, I just received a judge's review of a contest I didn't remember I entered! It was evidently a Writer's Digest-thingie I entered purely on a whim, as I don't as a rule enter competitions/contests.
The review concerns "Sally Lightfoot's Journey", and considering the book was written in verse which is NOT a popular venue these days for children's books, it's quite complimentary. However, the things the judge mentions as "errors" I was fully aware of, and it's one reason I don't submit my books to publishing houses but publish them myself. The often-eccentric, quirky verse I use in picture books and the early-20th-century prosaic style of DOPS is not considered marketable by contemporary publishing houses, and I frankly couldn't care less. Which having said is not a criticism of the judge's words (which are appreciated!); it's simply that my often-uneven style is what it is and I don't particularly care how marketable it is. And, "Sally" is a quarter-century old; the original manuscript perished in a house fire. The illustrations are modern, and completely different from the very abstract watercolor originals, which were done in pale pastels! In this case, I do like the replacements better.
Anyway, for your viewing pleasure, here's the whole kit 'n caboodle.
Oh...and in reference to the judge's comment that crabs don't swim, many of them do, one of the most famous being the Atlantic Blue Crab of Chesapeake crab cake fame, which has paddle-shaped fins on its rear legs (I believe crabs are decapods).
Books
are evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 meaning “needs improvement”
and 5 meaning “outstanding”. This scale is strictly to provide a point
of reference, it is not a cumulative
score and does not reflect ranking.
*If you wish to reference this review on your website, we ask that you cite it as such: “Judge, 22nd Annual Writer’s Digest Self-Published Book Awards.” You may cite portions of your
review, if you wish, but please make sure that the passage you select is appropriate, and reflective of the review as a whole.
22nd Annual Writer’s Digest Self-Published Book Awards
Structure, Organization, and Pacing: 5
Spelling, Punctuation, and Grammar: 4
Production Quality and Cover Design: 5
Plot and Story Appeal: 4
Character Appeal and Development: 4
Judge’s Commentary*: